Archive for June, 2006

Integrity of the Research Process - Evidence of Misconduct

Friday, June 9th, 2006

Personal Attributes. One of the first things to be considered is the personal attributes of the researcher. Is there evidence of
dishonesty
self-delusion
favoritism
extreme bias
emotional instability
recklessness
anti-social disorder
rigid thinking
sensation seeking
Technical Questions. Fairness requires that those involved in a misconduct investigation be technically qualified or have technical advisors so as to reach the correct decision.
Recommended Reading. Evidence of misconduct is […]

Integrity of the Research Process - The Allegation Be Proven by a Preponderance of Evidence

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

In addition to the two previous provisions defining findings of research misconduct, the one above applies. Charging anyone with misconduct is serious business. Thus, the government requires that there be a preponderance of evidence to support the charges.
Let’s define “research process”:
The American Heritage Dictionary defines the noun research as “(1) Scholarly or scientific investigation or […]