Misconduct must include three elements listed in my May 5, 2006 comments. This is the second necessary element. There are occasional frauds done intentionally or knowingly, but the ones that present the greater danger and uncertainty are those done recklessly.
In my comments of May 5, 2006 I point out that not doing a thorough search […]
In my May 5, 2006 comments, the first finding of research misconduct required under Federal regulations was
“A finding of research misconduct requires that:
There be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community.”
In my May 12, 2006 comments, I established that educational research is covered by the regulations in footnote 2.
It is my […]
In the Federal regulations regarding research misconduct (Federal Register, vol. 65, no. 235, December 6, 2006), footnote 2 says:
“Research, as used herein, includes all basic, applied, and demonstration research in all fields of science, engineering, and mathematics. This includes, but is not limited to, research in economics, education, linguistics, medicine, psychology, social sciences, statistics, and […]
Under Federal regulations as published in the Federal Register, vol 65, no. 235, December 6, 2000, findings are defined as:
“A finding of research misconduct requires that:
There be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community; and
The misconduct be committed intentionally, or knowingly, or recklessly; and
The allegation be proven by a preponderance of […]
You are currently browsing the Norman Edmund’s Educational Blog weblog archives for May, 2006.