Archive for January, 2006

The Scientific Method Is the Greatest Quality Standard of All Time

Friday, January 13th, 2006

The scientific method has been called the “greatest idea of all time.” I claim that it is also the greatest quality standard of all time as well. My reasoning is that the method has these quality standards:
1. Complete act of thought. It is a guide requiring all the mental activity stages comprised in a complete […]

Philosophers of Science

Thursday, January 12th, 2006

Many authors have said that the scientific method falls in the domain of philosophy of science. However, in the second half of the 20th century, philosophers of science did not show any interest in a full formula for the scientific method. This is largely a result of Sir Karl Popper’s claim that there is no […]

The Effects of the Blunder on the Teaching of Economics

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

Unfortunately, the blunder has resulted in the exclusion of the scientific method from national education reform programs for the past 40 years. Students have gained a little knowledge about the method from various textbooks. Credit is due textbook authors and publishers for what the public does know about the scientific method. Unfortunately, most authors devote […]

The Progressive Education Movement (1917-1957) vs. Traditionalists

Tuesday, January 10th, 2006

For a detailed description of the progressive education movement, see Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (1994) by Dorothy Gabel, American School Reform (1994) by M.R. Berube, and The American Ideology of National Science (1919-1930) by R.C. Tobey. While the traditionalists believed in teaching the usual subject-oriented curriculum, the progressives believed in a […]

Factors That Contribute to the Exclusion of the Scientific Method from National Education Reform Programs

Monday, January 9th, 2006

Philosophers of Science and Others with Complex Intellectual Theories about the Scientific Method
There are philosophers, scientists, and others who have not favored the scientific method as it has been described and formulated over the years, largely on philosophical grounds. Keep in mind that these descriptions and formulas have not been as complete, as detailed, or […]

A Message to Our Intellectuals about the Biggest Intellectual Blunder of the 20th Century

Friday, January 6th, 2006

There is no denying the importance of the intellectual community. Governments that persecute their intellectual elite do so at their country’s peril. History shows that countries who follow these practices drastically retard their welfare. Henri Le Chatelur’s article “Creation of an Intellectual Elite in Science and Industry (1928) states that “the formation of an ‘elite’ […]

As the Federal Government Goes, So Go the States Regarding the Scientific Method

Thursday, January 5th, 2006

Critics have argued that the many federal financial aid programs enjoy such a strong influence that they dramatically affect the teaching curricula of the states. I haven’t researched whether this influence is good or bad. However, I am calling attention to one very bad case of harm resulting from the federal government’s influence regarding the […]

Prepare a Self-Development Program

Wednesday, January 4th, 2006

It is a frightening (but challenging) economic forecast! Because of world competition, you will have to work smarter and become more innovative and creative than your parents were in order to be equal to or exceed their economic status. You must motivate yourself to improve and develop - student or adult. Here are some suggestions.
1. […]

A New Year’s Present

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

The Wisdom of Our Greatest Thinkers
Our scientists are close on the trail of a “theory of everything.”
Our greatest thinkers of the past have already given us “the method of everything.” Unfortunately, this is not widely known.
My present to you is an explanation of “the method of everything,” based on more than 16 years of research […]